Listening to some supposedly intelligent people discussing
about the current drought hitting Turkana County and many other dry corners of
Kenya prompted my mind to ask itself what the word 'drought' stands for. Is it
just a long spell of dry weather hitting a place? Or is it the dryness of our
minds and heartlessness of our hearts causing pro-people systems to turn
against the very same targets they ought to uplift?
Predictably many of us will point out lack of rains as the
real culprit causing drought and by extension leading to starvation - producing
those ugly images of women and children fighting for their dear lives. But away
from this rather common narrative there rests another critical component that
could possibly be the reason why drought kills, and why it should always kill
before a veiled 'anti-drought' intervention is quickly launched from all fronts
- government, non-government, religious... Unfortunately hidden from these
fronts is the question: has drought become so powerful to a point that it has
to be cuddled when measures against it are put in place?
This question is relevant because it forms the bedrock of my
fears that victims of drought do not appear to be the central reason behind
anti-drought moves in Kenya. And to arrive at this painful stop I had to do
some flashbacking. Actually if drought were to be set up as a business venture
it would have overpowered the influence of those known international oil
moguls. In Turkana alone this thing has attracted endless streams of cash, techniques,
people and organizations with little impact on the general public.
Perhaps the most visible benefit associated with drought is some
locals working as anti-poverty agents. But for how long? Drought benefits those
around decision-making tables. Of course this is an area that is highly guarded
because of its resourcefulness and the political power players it attracts.
This is why I believe drought and other disasters, natural and manmade, have
created lethal disaster hitmen patrolling northern Kenya's dry villages
scuttling any efforts to empower people. Enlightening these villagers is a step
these hitmen will explore every option to stop.
Sometime back I heard a well placed political broker sweet-talking
his colleagues. The talk revolved around ways to adopt so as to counter the
effects of drought that had ravaged their people. Preceding this small meeting
was a conference on disaster preparedness and specifically how to come up with
a viable way of sourcing for funds to facilitate this anti-disaster
intervention. In the conference were people from all sides: donors, politicians
and government representatives. To summarize this story, what has stuck in my mind
is a statement made by that political broker: "...some problems come at the
right time, moments when we need money for ourselves..."
Ironically this guy won't cower to shout about the power
vested in him to defend, speak for and stand with his people. It is such kind
of people that force me to pose the question: does relief food distribution
really kill drought, hunger?
I stand to be corrected. A disaster that attracts huge
funding inlets and heavy political participation is unlikely to end. Food
distribution is an exercise that needs money to purchase, store, transport, and
to distribute those rations to victims of drought. These are ways that service
lives of many; decision makers both in government and other bodies, politicians,
influence peddlers, business people, local agents and many other unseen demons.
Now tell me, why has it taken long for Kenya to even express its commitment to
bring an end to these painful episodes?
For your information drought is not just about starvation
and giving life to disaster hitmen. There are other effects. In many of these
dry places when it becomes drier, wind sets in. Apart from causing health
complications, these winds cause fires. Isn't it time to make life out of these
winds? (Wind energy, I guess, could be an option).
To bring down drought and its hitmen, I think it is time we
allowed this year's drought to trigger us to collectively do an honest analysis
on past anti-drought, anti-starvation interventions with a view to allowing a
new breed of interventionists with victims as their only and number one reason
to lead this anti-disaster fight.
Lemukol Ng'asike is an architect. Email:
lemoseh89@gmail.com. Twitter: @mlemukol.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your thoughts? thanks for dropping them here...