Ever since the emergence
of civil society groups in Africa questions still linger on what their
"true role" is. There is no clear understanding of what their mission
is. For the common man and woman in the streets and villages, civil society
groups are just but an offshoot of the usual non-governmental organizations. A
sought of foot-soldiers bankrolled to achieve certain ends. For the hoi polloi,
civil societies have just been as good as aid-dispensers.
Following this
confusion, I think, it behooves for the civil groups to come out boldly and
declare what responsibilities they carry and what people should expect from
them. Perhaps they should borrow a leaf from the political class and use what
is sell-able to the public to win them and move along with them in the journey
to full emancipation.
As evidenced by their
actions, it is clear that these pressure groups are guided by the philosophy
of: empowering the people to rise above all challenges (social, political or
economic). That is; to shield the people from the dangers of their own
shortcomings and the excesses of their governments.
But a look into their
activities leaves many questions than answers. The public is still far from
standing on its own. It still is unable to boldly and confidently point out the
excesses of governments. Its susceptibility renders it prey to rogue government
officials.
Put it another way:
civil societies have achieved little in empowering Wanjiku. They have reduced
Wanjiku to a cry baby - a helpless and confused Wanjiku who must be supported
to walk, talk, think and act. This is the farthest she has
"progressed".
This is not a blanket
condemnation. Civil societies have done a great deal of work. They have
received bullets and blows in defense of Wanjiku. But they have not achieved
the much needed goal of growing a healthy, focused and bold Wanjiku who can
receive the bullets and blows on her own.
This is why. They have
devoted much of their time in endless talks and shouts, and write-ups and
reports. It seems, they believe, too much talk will put ugali on
Wanjiku's table. Far from it.
Wanjiku can only stand
on her own if she is economically empowered.
Note the dividing lines
between the upper and lower classes in Kenya, for instance. It is not tribe. It
is not geography. It is not religion. Not even language does separate the two.
The dividing line is money. It is unga. Money is the cohesive force that
keeps members of the upper class together. Nothing else!
Economic fiat, it seems,
is the answer to our self-inflicted differences and "nothingness".
The 2007-08
Post-Election Violence is a true testimony of what money can do to keep the
affluent from slaughtering each other. An empty stomach is our greatest enemy.
It must be torpedoed for all to live in peace.
Similarly, it is almost
impossible to find the la crème de la crème of the Maasai community parading
their girls before knife-wielding grandmas in some bushes in Kajiado County to
mutilate their genitalia. You see, such acts are the preserve of the poor (not
in a negative sense though).
Which leads us to the
crux of the matter: economic empowerment should take center-stage in all
Wanjiku-centric activities.
A bellyful Wanjiku can
think, speak and act boldly, independently and authoritatively. Put ugali on
her table and you see her spring up!
Twitter: @mlemukol.
E-mail: lemoseh89@gmail.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your thoughts? thanks for dropping them here...